Amira Sajwani speaking during interview at DAMAC

5 min read

Why Great Leaders Listen Before They Lead [Part 1]

Written by

AlphaHAS Team

Most leaders feel pressure to prove themselves quickly. 

A new role, a new responsibility, or a new challenge often creates the same instinct: arrive with answers, announce a plan, and start making changes. Taking action can create a sense of progress, while making quick decisions can give the impression of effective leadership.

Yet some of the most effective leaders begin somewhere else entirely. 


In a conversation on DAMAC's DBate podcast, Amira Sajwani reflected on her early experience managing the company's brokerage channel. Rather than immediately introducing new initiatives, she spent months speaking with brokers, including many who were not actively selling DAMAC projects. 

For three months, she listened. 

Not to praise. Not to success stories. 

To criticism. 

That decision may be one of the most valuable leadership lessons from the entire conversation. 

Because before leaders can solve a problem, they first must understand it. 

The temptation to move too quickly 

Modern business rewards speed. Teams celebrate quick decisions. Markets move rapidly. Leaders are often expected to show visible progress almost immediately. 

The risk is that speed can create false confidence. 

Organizations frequently invest significant time and resources solving what they believe the problem is, only to discover later that they were fixing symptoms rather than causes. 

A company may believe sales are slowing because of market conditions when the real issue is customer experience. A business may redesign a process when the actual frustration comes from a single operational bottleneck. A leadership team may launch new initiatives while overlooking the everyday friction preventing current systems from working. 

As organizations grow, leaders can become increasingly disconnected from day-to-day realities. Listening helps them stay informed and gain a clearer understanding of what is happening across the business.

Why diagnosis is often more valuable than solutions 

One of the most overlooked truths in leadership is that great solutions rarely create competitive advantage on their own. 

Great diagnosis does. 

When organizations diagnose accurately, solutions often become obvious. When they diagnose poorly, even excellent execution struggles to produce meaningful results. 

This is why the most effective leaders are often exceptional observers before they become decisionmakers. 

Rather than assuming they know what people need, they spend time understanding how people experience business. 

Amira's approach reflects this principle. By meeting brokers directly and creating space for honest feedback, she gathered information that reports, dashboards, and internal discussions could never fully provide. 

Performance data can reveal where a system is underperforming, while employees who use it daily can provide valuable insights into the underlying causes.

Your critics may be your most valuable source of insight 

Most organizations enjoy speaking to loyal customers, engaged employees, and successful partners. The conversations are easier. The feedback is more comfortable. The challenge is that comfort rarely reveals blind spots. 

Some of the most useful business insights come from people who are frustrated, disengaged, or choosing not to work with you. 

These individuals experience the business from a different perspective. They notice friction that internal teams have learned to overlook. They encounter barriers that leadership may never see firsthand. 

One of the more interesting aspects of Amira's story is that she didn't limit conversations to supporters. She intentionally sought opinions from brokers who were not actively selling DAMAC. 

That distinction matters. Leaders who only seek agreement risk overlooking important information and missing opportunities to improve. Effective leadership requires genuine curiosity, a willingness to ask difficult questions and the ability to listen without immediately defending existing views. Some of the most valuable insights come from people who see things differently, question established assumptions and draw attention to issues that might otherwise go unnoticed.

 

Listening is not passive 

There is a common misconception that listening slows progress, in reality, good listening accelerates it. 

When leaders invest time understanding a problem properly, they reduce wasted effort, avoid unnecessary complexity, and increase the likelihood that solutions address genuine needs. 

The strongest operational improvements are often not born from brainstorming sessions. They emerge from careful observation, listening helps leaders identify patterns, patterns reveal root causes and root causes create lasting improvements. 

Without that sequence, organizations often find themselves treating the same problem repeatedly under different names. 

What leaders can take from this 

Amira’s experience offers valuable insights for leaders across industries, particularly those managing teams, building customer relationships, working with partners and driving business growth.

Before introducing change, understand how the current system is experienced by those closest to it. Before defending a process, ask where it creates friction, before assuming you know the answer, spend time understanding the question. 

Most importantly, seek feedback from people who have little incentive to tell you what you want to hear. 

Those conversations are rarely the easiest, but they are often the most valuable. 

Leadership starts with curiosity 

The story itself is simple. A leader spent three months listening before attempting to fix anything. 

At a time when business often celebrates speed, certainty, and immediate action, there is something refreshing about that approach. It reflects a different view of leadership. One built on curiosity before conclusions. Understanding before action. Diagnosis before decisions. 

Because the leaders who create meaningful change are not always the first to speak. Often, they are the ones willing to listen the longest. 

FAQs

Why is listening important in leadership?

Listening gives leaders’ direct insight into how employees, customers, and partners experience an organisation. It helps them distinguish visible symptoms from the underlying causes of a problem. Careful listening also exposes gaps that may not appear in reports or performance dashboards. With a clearer diagnosis, leaders can make decisions that respond to genuine needs rather than internal assumptions. 

How can leaders listen before making major decisions?

Leaders can begin by speaking with the people closest to the issue and asking open questions about their experience. Those conversations should include supporters, critics, and individuals who have disengaged from the organisation. Comparing recurring themes with operational data can reveal where perception and performance align. This approach allows decisions to be based on observed patterns instead of isolated opinions. 

What is the difference between listening and delaying action?

Listening is a structured effort to gather evidence, test assumptions, and define the real problem before acting. Delaying action occurs when information is collected without a clear purpose, timeframe, or decision point. Effective leaders set boundaries around the listening period and identify what they need to learn. Once the evidence is sufficient, they use it to move forward with greater focus and less wasted effort. 

Why should leaders seek feedback from critics?

Critics can identify barriers that loyal customers, engaged employees, or internal teams may no longer notice. Their feedback often explains why someone stopped participating, rejected an offer, or lost confidence in a process. Although not every criticism requires a change, repeated concerns can point to a systemic weakness. 

How does better listening improve business performance?

Better listening improves performance by directing resources towards problems that materially affect customers, partners, and teams. It can reduce repeated fixes, unnecessary initiatives, and operational complexity caused by a poor diagnosis. Shared understanding also makes implementation clearer because the reason for change is grounded in evidence. Over time, this creates more relevant solutions, stronger working relationships, and a more responsive organisation.